I’m sure everyone is very surprised to hear about this, but Bush biographers have confirmed my most glaring assumption about Oliver Stone’s new propaganda film “W.” They say that the script mischaracterizes and oversimplifies Bush’s presidency by painting him as a half-retarded drunk puppet of evil Cheney-Rumsfeld-Wolfowitz Neocons.

We’ve heard this story already, and it’s boring.

I smelled bullshit from a mile away when Stone claimed to want to make a “fair minded” portrayal of the Bush presidency. Yeah, like his other fair and balanced depictions of reality, like Platoon, Nixon, JFK, etc.

Just look at this imbecile.

This is the same douchebag that waited a whopping five years after 9/11 to cash in on the event. He composed the epic gay fantasy that was Alexander. And he’s been attacking Republicans via crappy movies for decades.

I’m still going to see it though, probably. I may even end up liking it, because the things that liberals claim to hate Bush for, like his passion for dismantling Hussein’s murderous regime as well as his jovial personality, I actually like.

And it’s just adorable how they’re trying to release it before November to influence the elections. Leftist Hollywood’s bizarre machinations are so predictable sometimes, its astounding.

2 Comments

  1. Wow you’re a really polarizing person when it comes to politics. Conservatives = good, liberals =bad, eh? And how sad you use gay as a synonym for stupid. Remove head from sand and try again.

  2. Jared,

    Thank you for your comment. The first thing I want to get out of the way is that by using the word “gay,” I didn’t mean stupid. I meant homosexual. If you’re familiar with the movie, it’s largely interested in portraying Alexander the Great as the homosexual that he allegedly was. But anyway…

    Yes, I am a pretty polarizing person. I do agree with those distinctions that you mentioned, with conservatives being generally “good” and liberals being generally “bad.” I’m not going to apologize for it.

    I also don’t feel the need to pull any punches when talking about politics. I’ve grown up in New Jersey and go to college in Massachusetts, and my opinion is in the minority. There are a few rare exceptions, but generally the Northeastern liberal establishment has zero tolerance for the conservative viewpoint. They censor, marginalize, belittle, and ignore conservative students like myself. This includes both the student body and faculty.

    All my life I’ve been called a Nazi, a racist, an ignoramus, a religious zealot, a homophobe and a misogynist. Every Republican I know is treated this way.

    Look at the way liberals talk about the White House. Bush is called a moron, a drunk, and characterized as Hitler. Condi is a called a black whore who is being tricked by the white man. Rumsfeld is a trigger-happy oil-hungry barbarian.

    I’m not bitter about it, it’s liberals’ right to attack me for the opinions I hold and the agendas I pursue. That’s politics. But don’t act like I’m supposed to turn the other cheek.

    In case you haven’t noticed, we live in a particularly partisan time period in American politics. I look forward to a non-partisan future to be enjoyed by perhaps my grandchildren, but I hold no illusions about the adversarial dynamic that Republicans and Democrats are working with.

    I’d be surprised if you actually do. Would you like to try again?


Post a Comment

*
*