The author uses words like “shit” (twice) and “fucking”.

He or she describes the sun’s temperature as “like, a billion degrees”.

His or her “figures” appear to have been drawn on MS Paint.

The primary evidence employed to support these assertions include the movies “Apollo 13″ and “Armageddon”.

The page you so kindly posted here to educate me is something less than scientific. What it actually is, appears to be some arrogant loser with just the wrong amount of time on their hands. They have too much time on their hands because only someone with no life would write an article like that, and too little because there doesn’t seem to be any effort or research put into it.

Turning back to the science, the primary threat posed by reduced atmospheric ozone is the increase in harmful UV rays. It’s caused by CFCs and other compounds, not CO2 emissions.

It has nothing to do with global warming. It’s a different segment of the environmental movement that global warming hysterics are pathetically and hopelessly trying to integrate into their propaganda.

A quick look at the article at wikipedia says it straight up:

“Although they are often interlinked in the mass media, the connection between global warming and ozone depletion is not strong.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ozone_depletion

Don’t take my word for it, read all about it for yourself. There’s a whole section on it.

One year it’s CO2, the other it’s CFCs. One year we’re worried about higher temperatures, the other we’re worried about lower temperatures.

It is a defining characteristic of scientific theory that it must be falsifiable. If it is impossible to prove something wrong with evidence, then the theory doesn’t count.

When environmentalists claim that yearly temperature increases as well as yearly decreases support their theory, then it is impossible to falsify and is thus not scientific.

It’s just crazy person talk. That’s all it is.