Here’s a new scientific consensus for you: all four major trackers of global temperatures, those being Hadley, NASA’s GISS, RSS, and UAH, have released new data that shows an incredible drop in global temperatures over the past year. Taken all together, the decrease in global temperatures is something between 0.65C and 0.75C.
Although to non “global warming” zealots this value may look miniscule, it is in fact large enough to undo all of the alleged warming that has taken place for the past 100 years. In fact, this is the most drastic global temperature change ever recorded in such a small interval.
Inevitably, the “global warming” dogmatists will scoff at this information. This is exactly the reason why the “global warming” enthusiasts of the 1990s have been (unsuccessfully) trying to spin their rhetoric as “climate change”. Because according to their twisted logic, any increase in global temperatures as well as any decrease in global temperatures represent a catastrophic symptom of an angry and vengeful Mother Earth. Oh, and let’s not forget that it’s all America’s fault. That’s the most important aspect of their ideology.
We’ve reached the point in this debate, or should I say lack of debate, where when temperatures inch up one year the Gore-heads shout, “See!?!?! We told you this would happen!”
Then when they inch down the following year, the Gore-heads shout, “See!?!?! We told you this would happen!”
Anyone who knows the first thing about climatology knows that global temperatures are fluctuating constantly. There have been enormous trends upward and enormous trends downward for thousands and thousands of years, indeed since the formation of the planet 4.5 billion years ago. They happen every single year.
Check out the graph of the past 20 years to see how pronounced the fluctuations in global climate are every year. There is no set global temperature, only a constantly changing value within a certain range.
“Global Cooling” was a crackpot theory popular in the 1970s, which apparently got some struggling scientists excited and some tree-huggers worried. Then the cooling trend reversed, and by the 1990s we were seeing a warming. So the new buzzword became “global warming”.
In 1998 the temperatures began falling again, and enviro-wackos were confused.
Convinced that their original misanthropically apocalyptic theory must have been correct, and desperate for a scientific basis for their left-wing ideology, the environmental movement began trying to use the phrase “climate change”. But most have not caught on to this new style of propagandizing, so everything we hear about in the media is about still about warming.
I wonder if the liberal mainstream media will catch on before science proves their bogus ideas wrong once and for all. After this new data has come out, get ready for more “climate change” as opposed to “global warming” rhetoric. Their obnoxiously misleading mediaspeak will only last them so long, I guess.
But, back to this new data. Some of you may be asking, “but why is the Earth getting cooler, and is this something to worry about?” The answer to both of these questions involves that big bright thing in the sky, the cause of just about everything that happens on Earth, the source of all life: the sun.
This is the most interesting aspect of this new data: it is linked with current solar activity. What’s more, anyone who has studied the topic or gotten a chance to see “The Great Global Warming Swindle”, knows that fluctuations in climate have an indisputable connection with solar activity. See this graph.
Global warming fans, please. Give up this foolish quest! Do not embarrass yourselves by trying to explain how C02, a greenhouse gas, has made the Earth cooler.
You need to convince people and governments to take care of the environment without resorting to blatantly false junk science. It will only hurt your cause in the future.
Global temperatures change constantly, and both upward and downward trends are explained beautifully by solar activity. CO2 offers a scientifically illegitimate explanation for warming, and in no way can it explain global cooling. End of story.
P.S. Read “Nobel Peace Dies” for further devastation of the theory of manmade global warming.
2 Comments
Sigh, global cooling is part of the proof that the ozone is eroding. Here, it’s everything you need to know about global cooling
Oh, really? That sparse, crude, simple-minded web page is all I need to know about global cooling?
The author uses words like “shit” (twice) and “fucking”.
He or she describes the sun’s temperature as “like, a billion degrees”.
His or her “figures” appear to have been drawn on MS Paint.
The primary evidence employed to support these assertions include the movies “Apollo 13″ and “Armageddon”.
The page you so kindly posted here to educate me is something less than scientific. What it actually is, appears to be some arrogant loser with just the wrong amount of time on their hands. They have too much time on their hands because only someone with no life would write an article like that, and too little because there doesn’t seem to be any effort or research put into it.
Turning back to the science, the primary threat posed by reduced atmospheric ozone is the increase in harmful UV rays. It’s caused by CFCs and other compounds, not CO2 emissions.
It has nothing to do with global warming. It’s a different segment of the environmental movement that global warming hysterics are pathetically and hopelessly trying to integrate into their propaganda.
A quick look at the article at wikipedia says it straight up:
“Although they are often interlinked in the mass media, the connection between global warming and ozone depletion is not strong.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ozone_depletion
Don’t take my word for it, read all about it for yourself. There’s a whole section on it.
One year it’s CO2, the other it’s CFCs. One year we’re worried about higher temperatures, the other we’re worried about lower temperatures.
It is a defining characteristic of scientific theory that it must be falsifiable. If it is impossible to prove something wrong with evidence, then the theory doesn’t count.
When environmentalists claim that yearly temperature increases as well as yearly decreases support their theory, then it is impossible to falsify and is thus not scientific.
It’s just crazy person talk. That’s all it is.